MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3091135304

Validation and Mechanistic Studies of Gluconeogenesis Regulators Identified from Zebrafish Chemical Genetic Screens

2017· dissertation· W3091135304 on OpenAlexaff
Junghwa Yun

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2017
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZebrafishGluconeogenesisComputational biologyBiologyBiochemistryGeneMetabolism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphoenolypyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) is the rate limiting enzyme in hepatic gluconeogenesis, which produces glucose from pyruvate to maintain circulating glucose level according to the bodyâ s needs. Cytosolic PEPCK (pck1) is widely studied for its crucial role in hepatic gluconeogenesis. High levels of pck1 are associated with the development of type 2 diabetes; conversely, improved insulin sensitivity is observed in mice with decreased pck1 level. Ten potential lead compounds from previous screening of 727 FDA-approved compounds were examined using pck1 zebrafish reporter lines, Tg(pck1:luc2) and Tg(pck1:Venus). Compounds were tested in larval zebrafish and ranked based on their ability to regulate pck1 expression and glucose levels. Subsequently, a diabetic mouse model was used to further validate the potential anti-hyperglycemic effects of the selected compound (Esomeprazole, Eso). Eso treatment improved glucose homeostasis in diabetic mice as determined by pyruvate tolerance tests. Here we describe a possible mechanism of action of Eso, which involves regulation of hepatic gluconeogenesis through insulin-dependent down-regulation of pck1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→