A las puertas de la Casa Rosada. La construcción del mundo imaginal kirchnerista (2003-2019)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La política envuelve todos los sentidos: escuchamos, vemos, leemos discursos políticos, participamos en rituales políticos, asistimos a movilizaciones y protestas, recibimos la visita de un dirigente, seguimos las cuentas de líderes en las redes sociales digitales. Símbolos, imágenes, rituales participan de los mundos imaginales que las distintas fuerzas políticas pretenden desplegar como espacio de incorporación. Este artículo realiza una interpretación del mundo éthico del Frente de Todos en las elecciones nacionales de 2019. Para ello, recorre las lógicas imaginarias que el kirchnerismo desplegó desde su llegada al Poder Ejecutivo Nacional en 2003. Una hipótesis guía este texto: el mundo imaginal del actual gobierno representa una mutación respecto de aquel de la última década kirchnerista. Su fundamento es la recuperación de memorias asociadas con la cultura democrática y con la capacidad de gestión, memorias de valores y experiencias que la propia fuerza había impulsado en su origen y que después dejó progresivamente de lado.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".