Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The writing of this paper aims to describe the process of making information about Karo tribe culture in North Sumatera. Data collected using descriptive research methods with objects of cultural research found in Karo tribes as well as techniques for collecting data through interviews with traditional male, female, and community members, as well as through literature studies in accordance with the discussion under study. Based on the discussion it can be concluded the process of making information about the culture of the North Sumatera tribe as follows: (1) determine the topic: the topic raised was Karo tribe culture. (2) information gathering: data collection on Karo tribe culture was conducted by interview. (3) packaging information: packaging information is carried out in accordance with the draft content that has been made in advance. The design of information content consist of the front cover, preface, table of content, introduction of chapter, contents of the subject of information on the culture of the North Sumatera Karo tribe, and the back cover. Keywords: information; North Sumatera Karo tribe culture
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it