MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Wind Turbine Power Output Estimation with Probabilistic Power Curves

2020· article· en· W3091288105 on OpenAlexaffabout
Siyun Ge, Ming J. Zuo, Zhigang Tian

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Advanced Reliability and Maintenance Modeling (APARM) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeibull distributionWind powerProbabilistic logicTurbineProbability density functionMonte Carlo methodWind speedPower (physics)Probability distributionComputer scienceStatistical modelPower optimizerControl theory (sociology)MathematicsEngineeringMeteorologyStatisticsArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringMaximum power point trackingPhysicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wind turbine power output estimation is an important problem in wind energy research work. Deterministic and probabilistic power curve models were reported when predicting the wind turbine power output. This paper proposes a probabilistic power curve model, and demonstrates it using field data from a wind farm in Alberta, Canada. Normal distribution and Weibull distribution are used to represent the probability density function of power output at various wind speed. Monte Carlo simulation is used to generate random predicting power output. The predicted result is compared with the observed data by 3 measurements and the proposed model is found performs better than other deterministic models and probabilistic models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2020 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Advanced Reliability and Maintenance Modeling (APARM)Same topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207