MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The use of pharmacological blockades in the complex treatment of lumbosacral radiculoischemia in patients with discs hernias of large sizes

2020· article· en· W3091335224 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
В. В. Андреев, A. I. Sychev, Е. Р. Баранцевич

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Osteopathic Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLidocaineVisual analogue scaleLumbosacral jointAnesthesiaRandomized controlled trialSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction . Lumbosacral dorsalgia is widespread and represents an actual problem. The greatest difficulties are noted in the treatment of patients with discs hernias of large size. Local injection therapy is actively used. The development of therapeutic methods in such patients remains relevant. The goal of research is to compare the effectiveness of pharmacological blockade in the complex treatment of spondylogenic lumbosacral radiculoischemia in patients with discs hernias of large size. Materials and methods . A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in March-November 2018 at the Neurological Department No. 2 of the Institute of neurology of the Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University. There were 58 patients with symptoms of lumbosacral radiculoischemia with discs hernias of large sizes. Depending on the used treatment method, the patients were divided into main and control groups. Each patient had 10 sessions of manual therapy lasting 20 minutes each. Sessions were held daily. Preformed physical factors were also used in all the observed patients. Preference was given to low-intensity laser therapy, the number of procedures was 10–15 with an interval on weekends, and the total duration of irradiation was no more than 20 minutes. Additionally, patients in the main group received local injections of diprospan and lidocaine, and patients in the control group received injections without the main substance. The intensity of pain was assessed by visual analog scale during the first day, as well as its intensity by the McGill questionnaire during 14 days. Results . The study included 24 men and 34 women with signs of compression radiculoishemias with discs hernias of large sizes. The level is lumbosacral (LIV–V, LV –SI ). When evaluating the data in the first hours and within 2 weeks, a significant decrease in the severity of pain syndrome was observed in comparison with the initial results in patients of both groups (p<0,05). The obsered data (pain intensity) significantly differed after 2 and 6 hours (p<0,001), as well as during 4, 7, and 8 days (p<0,01). The use of medication blocks with glucocorticoids has a more significant effect compared to the treatment regimen without the main substance (group 2) for 8–9 h (p<0,05) and 7-day treatment period (p<0,01). Conclusion. The medication blockades with glucocorticosteroids included in the complex treatment of patients with spondylogenic radiculoishemias with discs hernias of large sizes have a significantly more significant analgesic effect, while the effect is achieved in a short time. When using local injections with diprospan and lidocaine, the therapeutic effect appears gradually, and it persists for a long time — up to 2 weeks. The recommended number of injections is no more than 3 per course of treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Osteopathic JournalSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207