MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091409292 · doi:10.5334/ijic.5613

Correction: What Do Parents Expect in the 21st Century? A Qualitative Analysis of Integrated Youth Care

2020· erratum· en· W3091409292 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Nooteboom, Chris Kuiper, E. Mulder, Peter J. Roetman, Janna Eilander, Robert Vermeiren

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Integrated Care · 2020
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative researchQualitative analysisPrimary carePsychologyMedical educationData scienceComputer scienceMedicineSociologyFamily medicineSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article details a correction to the article: Nooteboom LA, Kuiper CHZ, Mulder E, Roetman PJ, Eilander J, Vermeiren RRJM. What Do Parents Expect in the 21st Century? A Qualitative Analysis of Integrated Youth Care. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2020; 20(3): 8. DOI: <a href="http://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5419" target="_blank">http://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5419</a>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.409 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Integrated CareSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207