Genotoxicity and neonatal subchronic toxicity assessment of a novel mixture of the human‐identical milk oligosaccharides lacto‐<i>N</i>‐fucopentaose I and 2′‐fucosyllactose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) are a complex group of bioactive molecules largely observed in human breast milk but also occurring in limited amounts in other mammalian milks. Advances in biotechnology have enabled production of human-identical milk oligosaccharides (HiMOs), structurally identical molecules to HMOs found naturally in human milk, intended for addition to infant formula to more closely replicate breast milk. Biosynthesis of a novel mixture of two major HMOs, lacto-N-fucopentaose I and 2'-fucosyllactose (LNFP-I/2'-FL), recently became possible. To support the safety of LNFP-I/2'-FL for use in infant formula and other foods, it was subject to a safety assessment comprising a bacterial reverse mutation test, an in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test, and a 90-day oral gavage study in neonatal rats. In the 90-day study (the first HiMO study to include the new endocrine-sensitive endpoints described in the 2018 version of OECD Test Guideline 408), LNFP-I/2'-FL was administered by oral gavage to neonatal rats once daily (from Day 7 of age) for 90 consecutive days, at doses up to 5000 mg/kg bw/day, followed by a 4-week recovery period. Concurrent reference controls received 5000 mg/kg bw/day of the approved infant formula ingredient oligofructose. LNFP-I/2'-FL was nongenotoxic in vitro. The highest dose tested (5000 mg/kg bw/day) was established as the no-observed-adverse-effect level in the 90-day study, as there were no test article-related adverse effects on clinical observations, body weight, food consumption, clinical pathology, and organ weights nor any noteworthy macroscopic or microscopic findings. This supports the safety of LNFP-I/2'-FL for its intended uses in food.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".