MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091525468 · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abbc27

EEG-based detection of mental workload level and stress: the effect of variation in each state on classification of the other

2020· article· en· W3091525468 on OpenAlex
Mahsa Bagheri, Sarah Power

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neural Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWorkloadComputer scienceElectroencephalographyBrain–computer interfaceClassifier (UML)Task (project management)CognitionLinear discriminant analysisArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionPsychologyNeuroscienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: A passive brain-computer interface (pBCI) is a system that continuously adapts human-computer interaction to the user's state. Key to the efficacy of such a system is the reliable estimation of the user's state via neural signals, acquired through non-invasive methods like electroencephalography (EEG) or near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Many studies to date have explored the detection of mental workload in particular, usually for the purpose of improving safety in high risk work environments. In these studies, mental workload is generally modulated through the manipulation of task difficulty, and no other aspect of the user's state is taken into account. In real-life scenarios, however, different aspects of the user's state are likely to be changing simultaneously-for example, their cognitive state (e.g. level of mental workload) and affective state (e.g. level of stress/anxiety). This inevitable confounding of different states needs to be accounted for in the development of state detection algorithms in order for them to remain effective when taken outside the lab. APPROACH: In this study we focussed on two different states that are of particular importance in high risk work environments, specifically mental workload and stress, and explored the effect of each on the ability to detect the other using EEG signals. We developed an experimental protocol in which participants performed a cognitive task under two different levels of workload (low workload and high workload) and at two levels of stress (relaxed and stressed) and then used a linear discriminant classifier to perform classification of workload level and stress level independently. MAIN RESULTS: We found that the detection of both mental workload level (e.g. low workload vs. high workload) and stress level (e.g. stressed vs. relaxed) were significantly diminished if the training and test data came from different as opposed to the same level of the other state (e.g. for mental workload classification, training on data from a relaxed condition and testing on data from a stressed condition, rather than both training and testing on the relaxed condition). The reduction in classification accuracy observed was as much as 15%. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study indicate the importance of considering multiple aspects of a user's state when developing detection algorithms for pBCI technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it