MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First report of <i>Golovinomyces cichoracearum sensu lato</i> on <i>Cannabis sativa</i> in Israel

2020· article· en· W3091570210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcel Maymon, Shachar Jerushalmi, Stanley Freeman

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Disease Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPowdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPowdery mildewSensuInternal transcribed spacerBiologyConidiumBotanyMyceliumInflorescenceGenusRibosomal RNAGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the use of cannabis (Cannabis sativa) has gained popularity for medical and other purposes, and its cultivation worldwide has expanded rapidly (Ruchlemer et al., 5; Jerushalmi et al., 2). During April 2020, symptoms of powdery mildew were observed on commercially cultivated medical cannabis in the greenhouses of several farms in Israel, causing serious concerns, since affected material was discarded, deemed unfit for medical consumption. Symptoms initially appeared as small, white circular patches of epiphytic mycelia with conidia on the upper sides of mature leaf surfaces, similar to those described by Pépin et al. (4). As the disease progressed, colonies expanded in size, coalescing and covering entire leaf surfaces, succulent stems and inflorescences (Fig. 1). Conidia were produced in chains on conidiophores that were single and erect, unbranched and cylindrical, arising from the colonies (Fig. 2). The conidia were hyaline, cylindrical to ellipsoid in shape, measuring 38.8-45.4 μm in length and 15.9-21.1 μm in width (Fig. 3). No chasmothecia were observed. The pathogen was identified by molecular analyses and sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA following amplification by PCR using ITS1 and ITS4 primers. Sequences were deposited in GenBank (Accession Nos. MT791387- MT791389), and BLAST analyses revealed 100% identity to Golovinomyces cichoracearum sensu lato, as recently reported from cannabis plants in Canada (Pépin et al., 4). Due to its complex taxonomy, G. cichoracearum is considered a species complex, composed of specialised as well as less specialised races, taxa or even cryptic species. Pathogenicity of the Israeli isolate was confirmed following inoculation of eight-week-old healthy C. sativa cv. ‘BB 734‘ from the Agricultural Research Organization (Jerushalmi et al., 2), by brushing conidia and pressing naturally infected leaves onto healthy ones. Inoculated plants were maintained at 22 ±2°C in a growth chamber under a photoperiod of 18 hr light (3000 lux) and 6 hr dark. Powdery mildew symptoms developed on mature leaves from two to five weeks post-inoculation, whereas non-inoculated plants remained healthy (Fig. 4). Until the recent discovery of Golovinomyces cichoracearum sensu lato, on C. sativa from Canada, powdery mildew on cannabis was thought to be caused by Sphaerotheca macularis and Leveillula taurica (McPartland et al., 3). The Golovinomyces sp. isolate that we obtained shared 100% identity with the strain from Canada and to the best of our knowledge, is the first report from Israel of this species on C. sativa. Golovinomyces cichoracearum has been reported from Israel on lettuce and other hosts, particularly belonging to the Asteraceae, however no molecular confirmation or pathogenicity tests were done (Chorin & Palti 1; Voytyuk et al., 6). The disease has already spread to three of the largest medical cannabis facilities over the past year and there is an imminent threat of further dissemination. The appearance of powdery mildew in these facilities is of concern and will require appropriate management strategies to ensure procurement of healthy and safe products for use by predominantly immunocompromised patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Disease ReportsSame topicPowdery Mildew Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207