MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091579691 · doi:10.14195/2183-847x_10_29

Um século na vida de Peter Pan: a personagem de James Barrie e as suas metamorfoses cinematográficas

2020· article· pt· W3091579691 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
María da Natividade Pires

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de estudos literários · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neste artigo analisam-se as diversas representações que a personagem Peter Pan, da obra literária de James Barrie, Peter Pan, publicada em 1911, foi assumindo ao longo de mais de um século em adaptações cinematográficas (neste caso, de 1924, 1953, 2003 e 2015). A complexidade da personalidade de Peter Pan, nos seus dilemas interiores, sofre metamorfoses diversas nos processos narrativos de adaptações transliterárias e multimodais, onde o papel dos espaços na construção da própria personagem é determinante. Interessam-nos as potencialidades da personagem e das estratégias discursivas para representação das relações entre mundos reais e mundos para lá do real, de formas de ver a infância e a vida adulta, o mito da eterna infância feliz e o seu complexo reverso de solidão. A refiguração da personagem também se concretiza através das suas relações afetivas com os outros, condicionadas, em parte, por valores sociais dominantes diversos ao longo dos séc. XX e XXI, como é o caso das questões de género, que se colocam na relação de Peter Pan com as personagens femininas Wendy, Sininho e a figura materna.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de estudos literáriosSame topicSocial and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207