MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091655481 · doi:10.18682/cdc.vi111.4229

Identidades que florecen a través de procesos sustentables

2020· article· es· W3091655481 on OpenAlexaff
Victoria Martinez Azaro

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and sustainability education
Canadian institutions123 Certification (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elaborando sobre la definición de sustentabilidad como la posibilidad de que los humanos y otras vidas florezcan en el planeta para siempre (Ehrenfeld, 2015), la autora se basa en su propia experiencia en prácticas sustentables y en su rol de educadora, líder y autora del proyecto social “The Traveling Sewing Box Project”© con la intención de compartir su experiencia personal de como a través de la empatía por el proceso mismo es posible generar narraciones que construyen y empoderan identidades en crisis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.021
Scholarly communication0.0110.010
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y ComunicaciónSame topicEnvironmental and sustainability educationFrench-language works237,207