Les stratégies rhétoriques de légitimation des investisseurs institutionnels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article cherche à explorer les stratégies rhétoriques mobilisées par les investisseurs institutionnels afin de récupérer leur légitimité, fortement dégradée, suite à la crise financière de 2008. Les résultats sont révélateurs d’un court-termisme marqué, ainsi que de la très faible conscience de la responsabilité sociétale et de la finance durable que les responsables des investisseurs institutionnels ont ou devraient avoir. Les acteurs financiers n’ont consacré que 5 % de leurs discours écrits sur la gestion de risques pour le champ sociétal, durable, et relationnel. Notre étude a montré que le recours à un discours social et environnemental dans les documents de référence de la banque Société Générale représente des manœuvres rhétoriques mobilisées pour faire face à des pressions sociales et financières.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.038 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".