Down-regulation of COX-2 activity by 1α,25(OH)2D3 is VDR dependent in endothelial cells transformed by Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus G protein-coupled receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our previous reports showed that 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1α,25(OH)2D3) has antiproliferative actions in endothelial cells stably expressing viral G protein-coupled receptor (vGPCR) associated with the pathogenesis of Kaposi's sarcoma. It has been reported that COX-2 enzyme, involved in the tumorigenesis of many types of cancers, is induced by vGPCR. Therefore, we investigated whether COX-2 down-regulation is part of the growth inhibitory effects of 1α,25(OH)2D3. Proliferation was measured in presence of COX-2 inhibitor Celecoxib (10–20 μM) revealing a decreased in vGPCR cell number, displaying typically apoptotic features in a dose dependent manner similarly to 1α,25(OH)2D3. In addition, the reduced cell viability observed with 20 μM Celecoxib was enhanced in presence of 1α,25(OH)2D3. Remarkably, although COX-2 mRNA and protein levels were up-regulated after 1α,25(OH)2D3 treatment, COX-2 enzymatic activity was reduced in a VDR-dependent manner. Furthermore, an interaction between COX-2 and VDR was revealed through GST pull-down and computational analysis. Additionally, high-affinity prostanoid receptors (EP3 and EP4) were found down-regulated by 1α,25(OH)2D3. Altogether, these results suggest a down-regulation of COX-2 activity and of prostanoid receptors as part of the antineoplastic mechanism of 1α,25(OH)2D3 in endothelial cells transformed by vGPCR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".