Mobile Match on Card Active Authentication Using Touchscreen Biometric
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the wide use of personal consumer electronics devices such as smartphones, people store sensitive and confidential information more on their devices. Active authentication (AA) systems continuously authenticate users to reduce possible attacks after a successful login on the device. In this article, we propose match-on-card (MOC) approach for a secure active authentication scheme using touchscreen for smartphones to enhance the security and privacy and decrease the performance overhead on the consumer device. We train a Deep Neural Network (DNN) model, and store the model on the smart card available on the device for user authentication. To implement the user verification on smart cards, we quantize inputs to the model and the model's parameters. A speed-up technique is added to the verification phase to improve the execution time. Evaluation results show that with a well configured DNN model, our on-card authentication reaches an Equal Error Rate (EER) of 2.6% for 15 strokes and verification time of 0.65 second for each stroke. Considering the average user's stroke frequency of 1 stroke/s, our proposed scheme shows the potential for mobile MOC active authentication using touchscreen gestures on consumer devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it