ATUAÇÃO DA IGREJA CATÓLICA NA PRELAZIA DE CAMETÁ: O CONTEXTO DA EDUCAÇÃO POPULAR NO PERÍODO DE 1980 A 1999.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pesquisa, em termos gerais, busca compreender como se efetivou a educação de cunho popular oportunizada pela Prelazia de Cametá às suas bases.Em termos específicos , analisar a formação e informação das bases pela Prelazia ,se está direcionou essa formação para a luta política, bem como observar quais resultados dessa educação tornaram-se visíveis. Desta forma, o objeto de estudo partiu da hipótese que a formação propagada na Prelazia durante a administração de Dom José Elias (1980 a 1999) desenvolveu-se sob viés político, formando com isso lideranças nos municípios de Cametá, Igarapé-Miri e Oeiras do Pará, que assumiram o Legislativo, Secretarias de Governo, Conselhos Municipais, etc., Logo, encaminharam-se análises sobre a atuação da Igreja Católica de Cametá com a educação popular, partindo do pressuposto de que a Prelazia de Cametá, nas décadas de 1980 e 1990, viabilizou educação de cunho popular às suas bases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".