Divergenze in celluloide. Colore, migrazione e identità nei film gay di Ferzan Özpetek
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recensioni / Book Reviews / Revues des Livres -259 -it.Of course, it is not surprising that these might be the topics most covered, given the era in which many of these stories were produced and the awe-striking views of nature that characterize this specific region.The nineteenth century, after all, is also the era of Romanticism and the exaltation of the sublime.Additionally, the work would have benefited from even just a small section on the history of the Pro Grigioni Italiano, as it would have helped the reader understand the context from which this collection emerges and why.The publication brings to the forefront an issue dear to many Italian speakers within the Confederation.The Pro Grigioni Italiano association emerges in an era in which the Swiss felt the need to defend and strengthen their national and local identities.As a minority community, Italian speakers today still feel this need particularly strongly, especially considering the eminence of Swiss-German and the continuously rising importance of English not only in the media, but also in the workplace and in academia, trends that appear as Italian at times struggles to stay relevant within the Confederation and within the Grisons themselves.Conrad and her team present a carefully selected array of testimonies of a region that has much to offer.Their efforts reveal their keen eye and passion for the Italian-speaking valleys.They provide readers with a clear and concise introduction, as well as an elegant appendix detailing the biographies of the authors.Overall, the collection shines through as an effort at unveiling a new side of this region's global relevance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".