MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091801395 · doi:10.30802/aalas-cm-20-000027

Pathology of Ground Squirrels in a Research Colony

2020· article· en· W3091801395 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround squirrelRodentPathologyNephritisMedicineBiologySquirrel monkeyAnatomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a retrospective review of the postmortem findings in a colony of wild-caught ground squirrels used in medical research. The species included in this study were Richardson's ground squirrel Urocitellus richardsonii , Columbian ground squirrel Urocitellus columbianus and golden-mantled ground squirrel Callospermophilus lateralis . The pathologic findings in 160 ground squirrels from this colony demonstrated a wide variety of conditions, with chronic nephritis and hepatic adenomas being the most frequent overall. All animals with gross lesions of chronic interstitial nephritis had both glomerular and tubulointerstitial disease upon microscopic examination. As the first review of pathology in a research colony of ground squirrels. this study provides data for use in comparative studies about rodent diseases and important information for those who maintain such animals for research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.537
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.045 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it