MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3091857300 · doi:10.22067/econg.v12i2.69021

Geology, petrology, geochemistry and geochronology of Tarik Darreh plutonic rocks, northeastern Iran

2020· article· en· W3091857300 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryGeochronologyPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The investigated area in northeastern Iran that is known as the Tarik Darreh arsenopyrite-Au-W prospecting target is situated in the Kopeh Dagh zone (Fig. 1). Most of the study area is covered with black slate rocks which most authors have referred to as Upper Triassic with Norian age (e.g., Behroozi et al., 1993). Plutonic rocks with gabbro, diorite, and quartz diorite and monzodiorite composition were introduced in the slate rocks. The previous studies in the Tarik Darreh are the preliminary report of arsenopyrite with Au-W quartz lode mineralization carried out by Taghizadeh (1965). Since then, the Geological Survey of Iran (e.g., Alavi Naini and Mossavi-Khorzughi, 2006) a few geologic companies and the universities (Shafi Niya, 2002) and Ghavi et al. (2013) have been studying in the area. In the present study, we provide more information, complete with new information about the geology of the Tarik Darreh area. Materials and methods Expansive field geology surveying to draw a geology map in 1:8000 scale and sampling from plutonic rocks was performed and two main fault system were distinguished in Tarik Darreh (Figs. 2 and 3). Thin section microscopic studies were carried out following field investigations. Magnetic susceptibility was measured with a portable Model KT-10 and GMS-2 Fugro instrument (precision of 0.0001 SI units). Sixteen samples of intrusive bodies and dykes were analyzed for major and trace elements using 4E-Reserch package (INAA, FUS ICP-OMS, ICP-MS) at the Acme Lab (Canada). Gabbroic units were selected for U-Pb geochronological study. In the heavy liquid process, zircon crystals were separated, hand-picked under microscope. Zircon grains for Th-U-Pb dating were examined by an Agilent 7700 quadrupole ICPMS at the University of Tasmania (Australia). Discussion and Results Plutonic rocks in the Tarik Darreh area are in the form of bodies and dykes. The plutonic bodies are mostly gabbro, gabbro diorite, diorite (hornblende pyroxene diorite, biotite hornblende diorite and hornblende biotite diorite), biotite hornblende monzodiorite, quartz diorite, and quartz monzonite in composition. However, it is diorite with granular textures as a common rock (Figs. 4 and 6). Other rocks as dyke have more hornblende diorite composition with porphyritic textures. Common mafic minerals in the plutonic rocks in the Tarik Darreh include pyroxene, hornblende and biotite. The alteration assemblages of uralite, chlorite, calcite and sericite are very common gabbroic-diorite rocks (Fig. 5). The plutonic rocks have SiO2 with values in the range of 46 to 56% (Table 1). Therefore, these rocks are intermediate in composition. Most of these rocks also have high K-calc-alkaline composition with metaluminous characteristic (Fig. 7). Enrichment in LREE relative to HREE, low La/By ratio, enrichment in LILE and negative anomaly of Eu, Ti, Zr, Y and Ba are shared in all of the studied plutonic rocks and dykes (Figs. 8 and 9). All the plutonic rocks have low values of magnetic susceptibility (less than 3×10-3 SI). Two main systems of fault have affected the area (Fig. 10). Plutonic rocks from the Tarik Darreh area are placed within the volcanic arc to within plate’s environment in tectonic setting discrimination diagrams (Fig. 11). Zircon U-Pb dating results on the gabbroic rocks are shown in Table 2. Zircon grains through cathodoluminescence imaging show euhedral, clear crystals with no visible heritage cores. However, some of them have inclusions. Zircon U-Pb dating indicates that the gabbroic rocks formed at 215.5±0.9 Ma (late Triassic) (Fig. 12). Thus, it is obvious that the country rock (called Miankuhi Formation), must be older than the late Triassic plutonic rocks rather than Norian age as previously thought. The variation of major elements with SiO2 in the plutonic rocks from Tarik Darreh (Fig. 13) indicates that the primary magma of these plutonic rocks underwent fractional crystallization from gabbro to quartz monzodiorite. Geochemical characteristics such as low ratios of (La/Yb)N (<13), high contents of MgO (7%), high Mg# (57) and high Sr (on average 572 ppm) indicate that the magma of the studied rocks have probably originated from partial melting of garnet-free source from mantle or low continental crust. However, the presence of slate as country rocks suggest possible assimilation of country rocks that indicate processes such as assimilation were more likely to be responsible for the evolution of plutonic rocks in the Tarik Darreh area. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Prof. Yuanming Pan (University of Saskatchewan) for supporting this study and Eng. Amin Haghdoost for his help during the field geology work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→