MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Delay-Sensitive Computation Partitioning for Mobile Augmented Reality Applications

2020· article· en· W3091860765 on OpenAlexaff
Chaokun Zhang, Rong Zheng, Yong Cui, Chenhe Li, Jianping Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRendering (computer graphics)ComputationEdge computingJob shop schedulingMobile edge computingAugmented realityHeuristicDistributed computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionReal-time computingAlgorithmEmbedded systemComputer graphics (images)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Good user experiences in Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) applications require timely processing and rendering of virtual objects on user devices. Today's wearable AR devices are limited in computation, storage, and battery lifetime. Edge computing, where edge devices are employed to offload part or all computation tasks, allows an acceleration of computation without incurring excessive network latency. In this paper, we use acyclic data flow graphs to model the computation and data flow in MAR applications and aim to minimize the makespan of processing input frames. Due to task dependencies and variable resource availability, makespan minimization is proven to be NP-hard in general. We design DPA, a polynomial-time heuristic algorithm for this problem. For special data flow graphs including chain or star, the algorithm can provide optimal solutions or solutions with a constant approximation ratio. The effectiveness of DPA has been evaluated using extensive simulations with realistic workloads and resource availability measured from a prototype implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207