MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Reconstruction of the Inshore Labrador Current using SWOT: from OI to DENKF

2020· article· en· W3091887703 on OpenAlexaffabout
Guoqi Han, Zhimin Ma

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSWOT analysisSea-surface heightGeostrophic currentCurrent (fluid)Ocean surface topographyData assimilationOcean currentKalman filterGeostrophic windInterpolation (computer graphics)GeographyOceanographyGeologyEnvironmental scienceClimatologyMeteorologyAltimeterMathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hourly sea surface height (SSH) from a coastal ocean model off eastern Newfoundland is used to generate simulated surface water and ocean topography (SWOT) data by a SWOT simulator. The simulated SWOT data are then used to reconstruct SSH by applying optimal interpolation (OI) in time and space. The reconstructed SSH is further used to calculate geostrophic currents associated with the inshore Labrador Current. The simulated SWOT data are also assimilated into the coastal ocean model by applying a deterministic ensemble Kalman filter (DEnKF). It is found that the inshore Labrador Current is fairly well reconstructed at the weekly scale, while the DEnKF assimilation reproduces well the inshore Labrador Current at not only weekly but also daily scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→