MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091895223 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.413

Collecting Data on Sexual & Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Settings

2020· article· en· W3091895223 on OpenAlexaff
J Ferne

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCensus and Population Estimation
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbortionReproductive healthFocus groupHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Variety (cybernetics)Resource (disambiguation)Data collectionSexual and reproductive health and rightsSexual violenceMedicineReproductive rightsPsychologyMedical emergencyPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthFamily medicineNursingBusinessPregnancyComputer scienceSociologyPopulationSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Unsafe abortion is a major contributor to maternal death and disability in humanitarian/ contexts, and women and girls are at considerable risk of experiencing forced marriage and sexual violence, as well as acquiring HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. Routine, reliable and rigorously collected data on sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in humanitarian settings are sparse globally irrespective of region or state of emergency. This problem is pronounced in politicized SRH issues such as abortion. This innovation has piloted a variety of strategies including data mapping, resource inventory, focus group/interviews, and other approaches to map challenges associated with collection and indicator development. Indicators have been developed, a toolkit with pre-programmed tablets to record information and detailed instructions for how to collect abortion information has been piloted, and a central database will be established to make SRHR data (particularly abortion and advocacy data) more widely available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.461
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.034 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicCensus and Population EstimationFrench-language works237,207