MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091902298 · doi:10.4000/ries.9853

Disparition des commissions scolaires au Québec : un nouvel équilibre ?

2020· article· fr· W3091902298 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michel Boyer, Isabelle Lacroix

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale d éducation de Sèvres · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsFédération des Commissions Scolaires du QuébecCommission Scolaire des Hautes Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En février 2020, l’Assemblée nationale du Québec a modifié sa Loi sur l’instruction publique en abolissant les commissions scolaires. Le gouvernement du Québec, province canadienne possédant la compétence exclusive dans les affaires éducatives sur son territoire, mettait fin à une longue tradition qualifiée par l’historien Katz, cité par Lessard (2020), de « localisme démocratique » dans la gestion de ses écoles. Dans cette tradition, la gestion – gouverne – des écoles est confiée à des comm...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0110.010
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale d éducation de SèvresSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207