MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3091924297 · doi:10.1139/cjpp-2020-0313

Regulatory role of cardiomyocyte metabolism via AMPK activation in modulating atrial structural, contractile, and electrical properties following atrial fibrillation

2020· review· en· W3091924297 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sean M. Brown, Nicholas K. Larsen, Finosh G. Thankam, Devendra K. Agrawal

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsAtrial fibrillationAMPKInternal medicineMedicineCardiologyPathogenesisHeart failurePathophysiologyMyocyteThrombusEndocrinologyProtein kinase APhosphorylationBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The number of patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been rising due to increased incidence, enhanced detection methods, and greater survival rates following diagnosis. Due to this increase, AF is now the most commonly diagnosed arrhythmia in clinical practice. AF is characterized by irregular, high-frequency contractions of atrial myocytes that lead to turbulent blood flow and the potential for thrombus formation, stroke, or heart failure. These high-frequency contractions of the atrial myocytes cause an imbalance between metabolic supply and demand. Although advances have been made in understanding the pathophysiology of AF, the etiology and underlying pathogenic mechanism remain unknown. However, recent evidence suggests that cardiomyocyte metabolism involving 5' AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation is altered in patients with AF. Here, we critically reviewed the current understanding of AMPK activation in AF and how it could affect structural, contractile, and electrophysiological cellular properties in the pathogenesis of AF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology→Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→