MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091928361 · doi:10.1002/uog.23140

Three‐dimensional cinematic rendering of fetal skeletal dysplasia using postmortem computed tomography

2020· article· en· W3091928361 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Susan C. Shelmerdine, Neil J. Sebire, Alistair Calder, Owen J. Arthurs

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research Council CanadaGreat Ormond Street Hospital CharityRoyal College of RadiologistsMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineDysplasiaRendering (computer graphics)Volume renderingRadiologyAutopsyPathologyArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As parental consent for invasive perinatal autopsy is increasingly declined, postmortem cross-sectional imaging techniques have gained popularity as tools for confirming antenatal findings and highlighting new abnormalities. In addition to being a non-invasive method, one of the major benefits of imaging is that it allows acquisition of three-dimensional (3D) volumetric datasets which can be postprocessed to produce a variety of imaging reconstructions, such as the traditional volume-rendering (VR) technique. Recently, a novel software termed 'cinematic rendering' (CR) (syngo.via, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) was developed and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for clinical use, which provides a more 'photorealistic' and detailed imaging reconstruction. Whilst CR technology bears several similarities to VR, it utilizes a more complex light modeling algorithm incorporating information from multiple light paths and predicted photon-scattering patterns1, 2. Several recent publications have demonstrated the superior realism and expressiveness of CR over VR techniques in musculoskeletal3-5 and vascular diseases, including in the case of a pregnant patient with Loeys–Dietz syndrome6. Given that this technique has been shown to perform best when there are greatest contrast differences between tissues, we applied the software to two postmortem computed tomography datasets which were acquired as part of the perinatal death investigation in two fetuses with lethal skeletal dysplasia. The first case was of a 22-week female fetus that underwent termination of pregnancy due to a prenatal diagnosis of suspected skeletal dysplasia (Figure 1). Radiographically, the diagnosis was in keeping with thanatophoric dysplasia. Both the VR and CR reconstructions demonstrated key characteristics of shortened, curved long bones, curved femora with trident acetabula and narrow thoracic cavity. However, the bone reconstruction using the CR method appeared less pixelated and the paler soft-tissue CR overlay (Figure 1c) appeared more realistic and comparable to fetal skin than the red VR overlay (Figure 1a). The second case was of a stillborn 39-week male fetus with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) Type II (Figure 2). The mother had not attended any antenatal appointment and the diagnosis was made at postmortem imaging. Both the CR and VR techniques demonstrated the classical features of OI with numerous fractured bones with callus formation leading to bowed, shortened limbs and 'beaded' appearance of the ribs. The fetus was also noted to have a left inguinal hernia containing small bowel loops. Again, the CR images provided more photorealistic detail of the internal organs and skeletal findings, with less pixelation compared to the VR reconstructions. In conclusion, CR appears to represent a promising method for providing more realistic 3D reconstructions of fetal postmortem imaging for skeletal dysplasia over traditional VR techniques, without any loss of detail relating to the underlying pathology. It can produce 'sanitized' images of the fetus, which could be helpful in communicating the findings to the parents, or as an educational tool for training healthcare professionals7. Further work comparing formally the acceptability and benefit of CR techniques vs those of standard two-dimensional images and 3D printed models is required. S.C.S. is supported by a UK Research and Innovation Fellowship and Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Research Training Fellowship (Grant Ref: MR/R002118/1). This award is jointly funded by the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR). O.J.A. is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Career Development Fellowship (NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037). The authors receive funding from the Great Ormond Street Children's Charity and the Great Ormond Street Hospital NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. This article presents independent research funded by the MRC, RCR, NIHR and the views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, MRC, RCR, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicAutopsy Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207