MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092022576 · doi:10.25157/ma.v6i2.3401

KORBAN ALIH FUNGSI LAHAN DI KELURAHAN SETIANAGARA, KECAMATAN CIBEUREUM, KOTA TASIKMALAYA, JAWA BARAT

2020· article· id· W3092022576 on OpenAlexaff
Ivanka Marayandini, Trisna Insan Noor

Bibliographic record

VenueMIMBAR AGRIBISNIS Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Development and Management
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoercion (linguistics)GeographyPaddy fieldLand useAgricultural landAgricultureSocioeconomicsCivil engineeringSociologyEngineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cibeureum District is one of the four sub-districts in the City of Tasikmalaya with the highest reduction in paddy fields area. The study was conducted in Setianagara which is included in the LP2B (Sustainable Food Agricultural Land) area but is still experiencing lang conversion. This study aims to determine the profile of victims of land use change, push and pull factors switching land use, and the condition of the victims before and after land use change. The design in this study used a qualitative descriptive design and research techniques using case studies. The information obtained comes from interviews and observations. Informants in this study are victims of land use change. The results showed that the factors driving the conversion of land originated from self and coercion, while the pull factors came from the buyers of the paddy fields and coercion. The situation of farmers before and after land use change has changed for the worse, more stable, and better.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMIMBAR AGRIBISNIS Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan AgribisnisSame topicAgricultural Development and ManagementFrench-language works237,207