Bibliographic record
Abstract
LGBT is a sexuality issue that is still being debated in Indonesian society, especially in the religious scope. The church,as a place of worship which is a community with the same belief to worship, has teachings with an interpretation that considers LGBT a sin. Gereja Komunitas Anugerahand the Metropolitan Community Church of Toronto are churches that openly accept LGBT congregations. The two churches are trying to support LGBT congregations by holding activities that discuss the rights of LGBT congregations. This research wants to know how the acceptance of LGBT congregations by churches as a place of worship in Indonesia. Researchers review from the communication side, communication functions and goals. The method used in this research is a phenomenological method with a qualitative descriptive approach. The research data were obtained from in-depth interviews, direct observation, document study and literature study. The conclusion of this research is that the church as a place of worship accepts LGBT because it has a meaning of the holy book verse. Acceptance is carried out by communicating with LGBT people, supporting, instilling religious values, and inviting them to be involved in activities at places of worship.LGBT merupakan isu seksualitasyang masih menjadi perdebatan di masyarakat Indonesia, khususnyapada lingkup keagamaan. Gereja sebagai tempat ibadah yang merupakan suatu komunitas dengan kepercayaan yang sama untuk beribadah pada umumnya memiliki ajaran dengan tafsiran yang menganggap bahwa LGBT merupakan suatu dosa. Gereja Komunitas Anugerah dan Metropolitan Community Church of Torontoadalah gereja yang secara terbuka menerima jemaat LGBT.Kedua gereja tersebutberupaya mendukung jemaat LGBT dengan mengadakan kegiatan yang membahas hak jemaat LGBT. Penelitian ini ingin mengetahui bagaimanapenerimaan jemaat LGBT yang dilakukan olehgereja sebagai tempat ibadah di Indonesia. Peneliti meninjau dari sisikomunikasi, fungsi dan tujuan komunikasi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode fenomenologi dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Data penelitian diperoleh dari wawancara mendalam,pengamatan langsung, studi dokumen dan studi kepustakaan. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalahgereja sebagai tempat ibadah menerima LGBT karena memiliki pemaknaan terhadap ayat kitab suci. Penerimaan dilakukan dengan berkomunikasi dengan para LGBT, mendukung, menanamkan nilai-nilai agama, dan mengajak ikut terlibat dalam kegiatan di tempat ibadah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".