Analysis of a phase-variable restriction modification system of the human gut symbiont Bacteroides fragilis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genomes of gut Bacteroidales contain numerous invertible regions, many of which contain promoters that dictate phase-variable synthesis of surface molecules such as polysaccharides, fimbriae, and outer surface proteins. Here, we characterize a different type of phase-variable system of Bacteroides fragilis, a Type I restriction modification system (R-M). We show that reversible DNA inversions within this R-M locus leads to the generation of eight specificity proteins with distinct recognition sites. In vitro grown bacteria have a different proportion of specificity gene combinations at the expression locus than bacteria isolated from the mammalian gut. By creating mutants, each able to produce only one specificity protein from this region, we identified the R-M recognition sites of four of these S-proteins using SMRT sequencing. Transcriptome analysis revealed that the locked specificity mutants, whether grown in vitro or isolated from the mammalian gut, have distinct transcriptional profiles, likely creating different phenotypes, one of which was confirmed. Genomic analyses of diverse strains of Bacteroidetes from both host-associated and environmental sources reveal the ubiquity of phase-variable R-M systems in this phylum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".