MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092068600 · doi:10.1002/rnc.5253

Event‐triggered adaptive finite‐time prescribed performance tracking control for uncertain nonlinear systems

2020· article· en· W3092068600 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemTracking (education)Tracking errorComputer scienceController (irrigation)Zeno's paradoxesEvent (particle physics)Control (management)Adaptive controlMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary This article addresses the problem of adaptive finite‐time tracking control for unknown nonlinear systems based on event‐triggered and prescribed performance control. For the first time, a new adjustable finite‐time performance function is developed, whose parameters are adjusted online with the change of tracking errors so that it converges faster. Besides, a novel event‐triggered control method is introduced to switch smoothly between the fixed and relative threshold strategies. Finally, an adaptive finite‐time tracking controller is constructed, which ensures the boundness of all the signals in the closed‐loop system and elimination of the Zeno behavior. Simultaneously, the output tracking error falls in a fixed region at pre‐defined finite time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it