MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092089183 · doi:10.1364/networks.2020.nem3b.5

Optical Amplifier Control in Optical Networks using Machine Learning

2020· article· en· W3092089183 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Lepers, Maria Freire-Hermelo, Antoine Lavignotte, Dipankar Sengupta, Christine Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueOSA Advanced Photonics Congress (AP) 2020 (IPR, NP, NOMA, Networks, PVLED, PSC, SPPCom, SOF) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical amplifierComputer scienceOptical performance monitoringEqualization (audio)AmplifierFocus (optics)ExcursionAutomatic gain controlOptical cross-connectControl (management)Electronic engineeringWavelengthWavelength-division multiplexingArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsOptical fiberEngineeringOptoelectronicsOpticsPhysicsBandwidth (computing)Channel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical amplifiers exhibit wavelength dependent gain resulting in power excursion. We present gain equalization techniques not suitable for flexible optical networks and focus on machine learning as an alternative solution to solve the problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSA Advanced Photonics Congress (AP) 2020 (IPR, NP, NOMA, Networks, PVLED, PSC, SPPCom, SOF)Same topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207