MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092141482 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.950

Estimating burden of foodborne diseases where public health impact is higher and data scarcer: a study in four African countries

2020· article· en· W3092141482 on OpenAlexaff
Binyam Negussie Desta

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicZoonotic diseases and public health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTanzaniaDisease burdenData collectionEnvironmental healthPopulationDeveloping countryBusinessBurden of diseaseDisease surveillanceTransparency (behavior)GeographyPublic healthMedicineEnvironmental planningEconomic growthComputer scienceEconomicsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Low and middle-income countries, in particular from Africa, bear the highest burden of foodborne disease (FBD). However, because research and disease surveillance data from Africa are limited, previous burden estimates are subject to uncertainty. The main challenge to estimating burden of FBD in Africa is lack of data, where factors ranging from lack of capacity to lack of political commitment, and a focus on priority diseases, limit existing surveillance systems. To address this, we are working with Ethiopia, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Tanzania, to estimate the burden of, and strengthen surveillance systems for, FBD in Africa. We are conducting a population survey (to estimate incidence and distribution of diarrhea in the community), a systematic literature review (to estimate proportions of diarrheal disease caused by different agents), and an active review of available FBD reports (to estimate the extent of under-reporting in existing surveillance). Together, these findings will provide more accurate estimates of the burden of FBD for African countries. Lessons from this large-scale project can be extrapolated to other countries and regions where the burden is high but data are scarce. We highlight applying leadership attributes, including delegation of duties, setting milestones, regular meetings, transparency, and risk mitigation plans. The leading role of experts in this project helps to reduce hurdles. We have also adapted existing data collection tools for use across our diverse African study populations. We are engaging stakeholders who will use our research outputs, by involving them at all stages of the project. This integrated Knowledge Translation approach is translatable to other settings. These studies are part of FOCAL (Foodborne Disease Epidemiology, Surveillance, and Control in African LMIC), a multi-partner, multi-study project co-funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the United Kingdom's Department for International Development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicZoonotic diseases and public healthFrench-language works237,207