MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MPTCP+: Enhancing Adaptive HTTP Video Streaming over Multipath

2020· article· en· W3092161114 on OpenAlexaff
Jia Zhao, Jiangchuan Liu, Cong Zhang, Yong Cui, Yong Jiang, Wei Gong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipath TCPComputer scienceThroughputComputer networkDashBandwidth (computing)Linux kernelMultipath propagationPath (computing)Network congestionQuality of experienceReal-time computingQuality of serviceChannel (broadcasting)Network packetWirelessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a systematic study on adaptive streaming over MPTCP. We start from realworld experiments with Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH) and analysis on its performance over MPTCP. We show that DASH can greatly benefit from the improved aggregated throughput by MPTCP; yet the inter-path throughput difference and the intra-path throughput fluctuation have noticeable (negative) impact, too. Without a proper design of path selection and adaptation in MPTCP, they can easily confuse the adaptation logic of DASH, resulting in low bitrates or frequent rebuffering even if high-bandwidth paths are available. We present MPTCP+, an extended multipath TCP solution to offer high quality and smooth playback for adaptive HTTP streaming. MPTCP+ incorporates a path use decision algorithm that smartly disables/enables a path to minimize the inter-path difference, and a novel congestion control algorithm that smooths congestion window evolution with multiple paths. We have implemented MPTCP+ in the MPTCP Linux kernel, with minimum change on the server-side MPTCP module only. It is fully compatible with the existing MPTCP clients and requires no change on the upper-layer protocols, too. Our experiments suggest that MPTCP+ increases the quality of experience (QoE) of DASH by up to 50%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207