A PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT MEDIATES BETWEEN COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING AND POSITIVE MENTAL HEALTH IN MIDDLE AGE ADULTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This research aims to measure the impact of cognitive functioning on positive mental health mediating role of social support among middle aged adults. Design: Correlational Design Place and Duration: Data was collected from February, 2018 to May, 2018 from different universities. Subject and Methods: 200 participants were selected by purposive sampling from district Faisalabad with age range of 35 to 55 years. Information was gather through Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Positive Mental Health Scale and Multidimensional Perceived Social Support. Results: Results of bivariate correlation revealed significant positive correlation between cognitive functioning and positive mental health among middle aged adults. While in mediation social support plays positive mediating role in relation between cognitive functioning and positive mental health. In gender differences results confirmed the significant difference in terms of cognitive functioning, social support and positive mental health were found. Conclusion: It can be concluded that perceived social support among middle age adults is linked with positive mental health and cognitive functioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".