MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3092179401

MRI-compatibility enhancements to USM performance for interventional devices in MR environments

2017· dissertation· W3092179401 on OpenAlexaff
Peyman Shokrollahi

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2017
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompatibility (geochemistry)Biomedical engineeringComputer scienceSystems engineeringMedicineMedical physicsMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided robot-assisted interventions requires full control and high precision of assistive devices and tools. Because many currently available tools are not MRI-compatible, the characterization of existing tools and development of new ones are necessary. The behaviour of an ultrasonic motor (USM), the most common MRI-safe actuator, in a high-field (3T) MRI scanner was investigated. To characterize the axial force generated by the USM, a generic MRI-compatible force sensor (MCFS) was developed. USM effects on MCFS performance were examined under various sensor load and motion states while the scanner was on and off. The effects of the USM on MR images were investigated. The shift in the resonance frequency of water protons induced by the USM was measured. Image artifacts caused by the USM were classified. Geometric distortions on images and degradation of the signal-to-noise ratio were assessed. Compensation methods to reduce image artifacts were developed. To ascertain the potential risks of USM and the degree of MRI compatibility, the displacement force and deflection torque generated by the scanner on the USM were characterized. The effect of temperature increase caused by the scanner was also evaluated. Temperature increase causing degradation of USM output characteristics, can be reduced by the use of the developed USM case. In conclusion, the MCFS can precisely operate in the vicinity of USMs and in a high-field scanner. This research shows that it is not necessary to keep the USMs at a distance from the MR scanner to address compatibility issues. Furthermore, this thesis demonstrates that the use of compensation methods to reduce image artifacts and the recommended use of silicon carbide to reduce temperature increase due the magnetic field enhance the USMâ s compatibility and lead to safe, accurate, and reliable operation of the USM in high field MRI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→