Evidence that Bacteria Packaging by Tetrahymena Is a Widespread Phenomenon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protozoa are natural predators of bacteria, but some bacteria can evade digestion once phagocytosed. Some of these resistant bacteria can be packaged in the fecal pellets produced by protozoa, protecting them from physical stresses and biocides. Depending on the bacteria and protozoa involved in the packaging process, pellets can have different morphologies. In the present descriptive study, we evaluated the packaging process with 20 bacteria that have never been tested before for packaging by ciliates. These bacteria have various characteristics (shape, size, Gram staining). All of them appear to be included in pellets produced by the ciliates Tetrahymena pyriformis and/or T. thermophila in at least one condition tested. We then focused on the packaging morphology of four of these bacteria. Our results demonstrated that, as shown previously for Mycobacterium smegmatis, the packaging of Microbacterium oxydans, Micrococcus luteus, and Cupriavidus sp. was formed of a single layer of material. The packaging of Cellulosimicrobiumfunkei was made of indistinguishable material. A different pellet morphology was obtained for each of the four bacterial strains studied. The ingestion of small bacteria resulted in rounder, denser, and more regular pellets. These results support the idea that bacteria packaging is a relatively widespread phenomenon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".