MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092207751 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2020-0104

Development of ‘speed ratio’ based level of service criteria on undivided urban streets in mixed traffic context

2020· article· en· W3092207751 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ashutosh Pandey, Subhadip Biswas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisTransport engineeringContext (archaeology)Level of serviceTraffic congestionHierarchical clusteringComputer scienceTraffic flow (computer networking)Fuzzy logicService (business)Highway Capacity ManualService qualityFuzzy clusteringData miningEngineeringGeographyComputer networkBusinessArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developing countries are facing challenges in sustaining urban traffic congestion due to rapid urbanization. To manage urban traffic, a traffic engineer first needs to assess the current operational condition on urban roads. Level of service (LOS) is used to define the operational traffic condition within a traffic stream in terms of service quality that a facility is providing to its user. This paper proposes a novel approach to estimate ‘speed ratio’ by considering individual free-flow speed (FFS) of different vehicle categories. This study also provides a comparison between FFS estimated using the methods given in Highway Capacity Manual 2010 and Indian-Highway Capacity Manual 2018. LOS criteria were developed using five clustering technique: K-means, K-medoids, Clustering Large Applications, Fuzzy-C Means, and Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering. Both internal and external cluster validation indices were used to find the optimal number of clusters and suitable clustering algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207