MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092225117 · doi:10.36517/ep.v6i.42316.2020

Gênero, classe e raça no sistema social de Desterro (1877 – 1882)

2020· article· pt· W3092225117 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Flávia de Souza

Bibliographic record

VenueEm Perspectiva · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Sexuality, and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExecutorResidenceQuarter (Canadian coin)Capital (architecture)ArtLawGender studiesSociologyHistoryPolitical scienceAncient historyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article deals with two stories of women united in the same relationship system, built inside a manor house run by one of them, in the city of Desterro (Florianópolis), capital of Santa Catarina, in the last quarter of the 19th century. The study analyzes how these women, mistress and slaves, faced, from their social place, the rules of a patriarchal structure that legally dominated their lives and destinies. The first woman this story presents was Anna Francisca da Costa e Silva, a well-placed lady in the society of her time; Provider and administrator of the residence, where she lived in the company of four slaves and twochildren, Rosa and Maria Benedicta, daughters, respectively, of Eva and Benedita, the two characters who play the second story presented and that deals with the expectations that animated these two women. to petition in court for the custody of their youngest daughters, guarded by Anna Francisca's executor, as a result of their death.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEm PerspectivaSame topicGender, Sexuality, and EducationFrench-language works237,207