MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092252851 · doi:10.1177/1460408620961014

Mindfulness as an intervention after multisystem trauma

2020· article· en· W3092252851 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrauma · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMindfulnessAnxietyDepression (economics)MoodDASSIntervention (counseling)Mental healthClinical psychologyPsychiatryPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background There is a known significant risk of negative mental health consequences following traumatic injury, yet no standard approach to prevent psychiatric illness in trauma patients currently exists. Mindfulness-based psychotherapies have been shown to reduce symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety and improve resiliency, however it is unknown whether a mindfulness intervention immediately following traumatic injury would lead to diminished mental health consequences. Methods Multi-system trauma patients at the University of Alberta Hospital (N = 63) and the Foothills Hospital (N = 60) were assigned to the experimental and control groups respectively. Patients in the experimental group were asked to use the guided mindfulness application “Stop, Breathe & Think” for 28 consecutive days. All patients completed the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) 48 hours and 28 days following admission. An exit interview was conducted for patients in the experimental group. Results There was no significant difference in mean enrollment DASS-21 scores, mean enrollment CD-RISC scores, mean follow-up DASS-21 scores and mean follow-up CD-RISC scores between experimental and control groups. Paired t-tests of mean admission and mean follow-up DASS-21 and CD-RISC scores were not significantly different in the experimental group. Paired t-tests of mean admission and follow-up CD-RISC scores were not significantly different in the control group whereas mean followup DASS-21 scores were decreased in the control group relative to enrolment DASS-21 scores (p = 0.014). Patients reported improved mood after use of mindfulness, and most planned to continue using the therapy and would recommend it to others. Conclusion Our study did not demonstrate an objective benefit of mindfulness intervention immediately following traumatic injury. Exit interview data suggests that a web-based mindfulness intervention may be beneficial for certain trauma patients however further research is required to identify those most likely to realize substantial gains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it