MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092296339 · doi:10.11159/icnnfc20.125

Comparative analysis of sensory activity of carbon nanotubes withboundary modification

2020· article· en· W3092296339 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
N. P. Boroznina, И. В. Запороцкова, Sergei Boroznin, Л. В. Кожитов, P. A. Zaporotskov

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Recent Advances in Nanotechnology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon Nanotubes in Composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsCarbon nanotubeMaterials scienceNanotechnologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high sensitivity of the electronic properties of nanotubes to molecules adsorbed on their surface and the unparalleled unit surface providing for this high sensitivity make CNT a promising starting material for the development of superminiaturized chemical and biological sensors. Sorption gas sensors are the largest group of gas sensors. Their main operation principle is adsorption during which an adsorbed gas molecule transfers an electron to or takes it from a nanotube. In this paper we represent the investigation of sensor selectivity for alkali metals and their ions for boundary modified with carboxyl, amino or nitro group carbon nanotube. It has been found that sensors fabricated on their basis will have high selectivity and response to the presence of ultralow quantities of materials, e.g. metals included in salts and alkali, and this shows good promise for their use in chemistry, biology, medicine etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Recent Advances in NanotechnologySame topicCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesFrench-language works237,207