MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092314406 · doi:10.4000/cei.7431

La peste en Europe et la peinture italienne : relecture du Supplice de Marsyas de Titien

2020· article· fr· W3092314406 on OpenAlexaff
Silvie Bernier

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d’études italiennes · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette relecture d’un tableau tardif de Titien s’intéresse à son contexte sociohistorique, l’épidémie de peste de San Carlo à Venise qui aurait emporté le peintre en 1576. En adoptant l’angle de la peste noire, l’auteure fait valoir l’importance de la couleur noire qui est pigment, mais aussi signe sur la peau du pestiféré, symbole du diable dans la tradition chrétienne et dominante de l’humeur mélancolique. Ainsi, la fable d’Ovide telle qu’illustrée par Titien peut se lire comme la rencontre de savoirs médicaux, de croyances et de sensibilités propres au xvie siècle finissant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d’études italiennesSame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207