MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092328868

Electrochromic materials for display applications: an introduction

2001· article· en· W3092328868 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S Arman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicColor Science and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrochromismElectrochromic devicesMaterials scienceDisplay deviceLiquid-crystal displayOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyComputer scienceOpticsElectrodeChemistryPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An electrochromic device (ECD) is a non-emissive device similar to a liquid crystal display device (LCD). Electrochromism offers a way to modulate light which can be used in various optical devices. Main uses are in displays where there is a need to adjust the transmission of light while still being able to see through the window, or to show a changing message that need to be read from a variety of angles. Its main advantage is the 'ink-on-paper' appearance that gives good viewing properties from various angles. Current research in electrochromism is directed towards improving the contrast ratio and increasing switching speed. New and better materials that give improved properties to the devices is also a focus of research. This article is a primer on the subject, explaining how electrochromic devices operate, the nature of the device, its manufacture, its optical properties and applications. The paper concentrates on inorganic materials because they offer better stability and cyclability. Inorganic materials change colour with a double injection of ions and electrons; organic electrochromic materials change colour by electro redox reaction. 41 refs., 9 figs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicColor Science and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207