Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior of Prefabricated Wattle and Daub Walls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper summarizes an extensive research about mechanical strength of wattle and daub walls, employed in natural construction.Prefabricated wattle and daub walls, corresponds to the constructive system of frameworks, the perimeter of the walls of enclosures are composed of a wooden frame and the interior is a framework of Castilla canes, to eventually be covered with a mud mixture with clay, sand and vegetable fiber.Building with wattle and daub, is used worldwide, nevertheless, scant information is available about the strength of the walls against compressive and cutting loads.To gather more information about this, prefabricated wattle and daub walls were built in real scale 1:1, and tested in the University structures laboratory.Was obtained that walls have a ultimate compressive strength of 1.56M P a and the average shear strength is 0.13M P a, these values are higher than adobe's values and is recommended this natural construction in areas with earthquakes because its flexibility instead of adobe.These data are valuable for structural calculations of wattle and daub houses and make safer homes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".