Spawning season movements of transported landlocked Atlantic salmon in a newly restored river habitat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Certain spawning areas of the critically endangered Lake Saimaa landlocked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar m. sebago) have been recently restored by excavator- and helicopter-scattered gravel, but the success of applied methodologies has remained open. Here, we monitored the spawning-related movements and redds occurrence of transported semi-wild and hatchery-reared salmon in the restored River Ala-Koitajoki, eastern Finland, using radiotelemetry and snorkeling. Nearly all fish accepted the newly restored spawning habitats in the river that maintains a low flow rate (only 4 m3·s−1). The movements of females released up to 2 weeks before spawning time were restricted mainly to the closest rapids from the release site, and most of the movements were directed downstream. Semi-wild and hatchery background fish exhibited similar mobility, which was more variable among males. A majority of redds were found in restored areas, and both helicopter- and excavator-scattered gravels were accepted as spawning substrates. Our results indicate that natural reproduction of the studied landlocked salmon population can be successfully returned to its original spawning river by restoration of habitats and transfer of spawners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".