CXCR3A promotes the secretion of the antifibrotic decoy receptor sIL-13Rα2 by pulmonary fibroblasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) A and its IFN-inducible ligands CXCL9 and CXCL10 regulate vascular remodeling and fibroblast motility. IL-13 is a profibrotic cytokine implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and fibroproliferative conditions. Previous work from our laboratory has shown that CXCR3A is negatively regulated by IL-13 and is necessary for the basal regulation of the IL-13 receptor subunit IL-13Rα2. This study investigates the regulation of fibroblast phenotype, function, and downstream IL-13 signaling by CXCR3A in vitro. CXCR3A was overexpressed via transient transfection. CXCR3A−/− lung fibroblasts were isolated for functional analysis. Additionally, the contribution of CXCR3A to tissue remodeling following acute lung injury was assessed in vivo with wild-type (WT) and CXCR3−/− mice challenged with IL-13. CXCR3 and IL-13Rα2 displayed a reciprocal relationship after stimulation with either IL-13 or CXCR3 ligands. CXCR3A reduced expression of fibroblast activation makers, soluble collagen production, and proliferation. CXCR3A enhanced the basal expression of pERK1/2 while inducing IL-13-mediated downregulation of NF-κB-p65. CXCR3A−/− pulmonary fibroblasts were increasingly proliferative and displayed reduced contractility and α-smooth muscle actin expression. IL-13 challenge regulated expression of the CXCR3 ligands and soluble IL-13Rα2 levels in lungs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of WT mice; this response was absent in CXCR3−/− mice. Alveolar macrophage accumulation and expression of genes involved in lung remodeling was increased in CXCR3−/− mice. We conclude that CXCR3A is a central antifibrotic factor in pulmonary fibroblasts, limiting fibroblast activation and reducing extracellular matrix (ECM) production. Therefore, targeting of CXCR3A may be a novel approach to regulating fibroblast activity in lung fibrosis and remodeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".