MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Using Gamma-Ray and X-Ray Computed Tomography for Porosity Quantification of Reservoir Analogue Rocks

2020· article· en· W3092382987 on OpenAlexaff
Abraão Nova, F.L. RIBEIRO, Pamalla Oliveira, Daniel Amancio, Cássia Bezerra Machado, Carolina Alexandra, Marcio Paixão, Antônio Celso Dantas Antonino, Enivaldo Santos Barbosa, José Antônio Barbosa, Elizete Maria Lourenço, Marcos Rodrigues, Richard J. Heck

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorosityTomographyAttenuationX-ray microtomographyMaterials scienceMineralogyGeologyOpticsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the last few decades, X-ray micro-computed tomography (µCT) has been largely used to characterize rock properties and to create high-resolution 3D digital image volumes. It has allowed access to important information about porous systems in reservoir rocks. However, the reliable quantification of porosity of rocks which present porous volumes ranging from centimeter to nanometer scale remains a challenge. Assessment of nano scale porous volume is very difficult by image segmentation techniques, due to the intrinsic limits of the x-ray imaging method. Moreover, image processing for analysis of various types of porosity in the same sample, including microporosity could be computationally expensive. We present a method based in the Gamma-Ray computed tomography (axis attenuation) that can substantially improve the limits presented by conventional X-ray microtomography. This study compared the porosity values acquired by typical segmentation methods for microtomography images, and by the values obtained trough the proposed method of gamma-ray computed tomography to calculate the porosity. Results of both approaches were compared to porosity measurements obtained through experimental equipment (helium porosimeter). These analyses were performed in core samples of limestones and sandstones analogous of Brazilian oil reservoirs. The Gamma Ray Attenuation method (axis attenuation) presented a better correlation (R² = 0.9588) to the experimental measurements when compared to the image segmentation methods (R² = 0.9194). The results suggest that Industrial application of gamma ray tomography for precise evaluation of large number of core samples can be highly effective. Furthermore, the gamma ray data can be integrated with data provided by conventional µCT image processing to complement information regarding morphological aspects. Keywords: Porous System, X-ray microtomography, Gamma Ray tomography, Reservoir rocks

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207