MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effect of nitrous oxide on cerebral blood flow velocity in children anaesthetised with desflurane*

2002· article· en· W3092444728 on OpenAlexaff
C. Karsli, Igor Luginbuehl, Bruno Bissonnette

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNitrous oxideAnesthesiaDesfluraneTracheal intubationCerebral blood flowSevofluraneBlood pressureMiddle cerebral arteryHeart ratePropofolTranscranial DopplerBlood flowIntubationCardiologyInternal medicineIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of nitrous oxide on cerebral blood flow velocity in children anaesthetised with desflurane. Eighteen healthy children scheduled for elective surgery were enrolled into the study. Anaesthesia was induced using sevoflurane, and a caudal block was performed following tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia was maintained with 1 age-adjusted MAC desflurane. A transcranial Doppler probe was used to measure middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity. Each patient was randomised to receive a sequence of either air/nitrous oxide/air or nitrous oxide/air/nitrous oxide in 30% oxygen. Fifteen minutes after each change in the nitrous oxide concentration, three measurements of cerebral blood flow velocity, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. Neither the addition nor removal of nitrous oxide caused any significant changes in middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity, heart rate or blood pressure. This may be due to a more potent cerebral vasodilatory effect of desflurane in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnaesthesiaSame topicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207