MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092495569 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.564140

Circadian, Sleep and Caloric Intake Phenotyping in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Rare Melatonin Receptor 2 Mutations and Controls: A Pilot Study

2020· article· en· W3092495569 on OpenAlexaff
Akram Imam, Eva C. Winnebeck, Nina Buchholz, Philippe Froguel, Amélie Bonnefond, Michele Solimena, Anna Ivanova, Michel Bouvier, Bianca Plouffe, G. Charpentier, Angeliki Karamitri, Ralf Jockers, Till Roenneberg, Céline Vetter

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCircadian rhythm and melatonin
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Research in Immunology and CancerUniversité de Montréal
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsCircadian rhythmMelatoninActigraphyInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyType 2 diabetesSleep onsetBody mass indexPhysiologyDiabetes mellitusInsomniaPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Melatonin modulates circadian rhythms in physiology and sleep initiation. Genetic variants of the MTNR1B locus, encoding the melatonin MT2 receptor, have been associated with increased type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk. Carriers of the common intronic MTNR1B rs10830963 T2D risk variant have modified sleep and circadian traits such as changes of the melatonin profile. However, it is currently unknown whether rare variants in the MT2 coding region are also associated with altered sleep and circadian phenotypes, including meal timing. Materials and Methods: In this pilot study, 28 individuals (50% male; 46-82 years old; 50% with rare MT2 mutations [T2D MT2]) wore actigraphy devices and filled out daily food logs for four weeks. We computed circadian, sleep, and caloric intake phenotypes, including sleep duration, timing, and regularity (assessed by the Sleep Regularity Index [SRI]), composite phase deviations (CPD) as a sleep timing-based proxy for circadian misalignment, and caloric intake patterns throughout the day. Using regression analyses, we estimated age- and sex-adjusted mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) between the two patient groups. Secondary analyses also compare T2D MT2 to 15 healthy controls. Results: Patients with rare MT2 mutations had a later sleep onset (MD=1.23, 95%CI=0.42;2.04), and midsleep time (MD=0.91, 95%CI=0.12;1.70), slept more irregularly (MD in SRI=-8.98, 95%CI=-16.36;-1.60), had higher levels of behavioral circadian misalignment (MD in CPD=1.21, 95%CI=0.51;1.92), were more variable in regards to duration between first caloric intake and average sleep offset (MD=1.08, 95%CI=0.07;2.08), and had more caloric episodes in a 24-hr day (MD=1.08, 95%CI=0.26;1.90), in comparison to T2D controls. Secondary analyses showed similar patterns between T2D MT2 and non-diabetic controls. Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that compared to diabetic and non-diabetic controls, T2D MT2 patients display a number of adverse sleep, circadian, and caloric intake phenotypes, including more irregular behavioral timing than T2D. A prospective study is needed to determine the role of these behavioral phenotypes in T2D onset and severity, especially in view of rare MT2 mutations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysiologySame topicCircadian rhythm and melatoninFrench-language works237,207