MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Study of Variable Structure and Sliding Mode Filters for Robust Estimation of Mechatronic Systems

2020· article· en· W3092498701 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)MechatronicsControl theory (sociology)Variable (mathematics)Mode (computer interface)Variable structure controlComputer scienceSliding mode controlFilter (signal processing)Robust controlControl engineeringEngineeringMathematicsControl systemNonlinear systemPhysicsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a study of estimation strategies based on variable structure and sliding mode theory is performed. The smooth variable structure filter (SVSF) and the new sliding innovation filter (SIF) are based on similar sliding mode concepts but with some notable differences. The relevant literature and background are explored and the SVSF and SIF estimation algorithms are presented. For comparison purposes, the two estimation strategies are applied on a mechatronic system. The results indicate that although both the SVSF and SIF provide robust estimates to faults, the SIF formulation provides slightly more accurate estimates while maintaining robustness, and is less computationally complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it