Fabrication and characterization of lentil protein gels from fibrillar aggregates and the gelling mechanism study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heat-induced aggregation and gelation in lentil protein isolate (LPI) were studied over pH levels (pH 2-9), protein concentration (1-13%, w/w), and heating time (0.5-16 h). The LPI gels were formed from both fibrillar and particulate aggregates at pH 2 and 7, respectively. The gels formed from fibrillar aggregates at pH 2 were translucent and showed homogeneous and highly interconnected networks. While lentil protein showed weak gelling capacity, the gels prepared from LPI aggregates possessed good mechanical properties, and the optimized gel demonstrated a compressive strength of 2.37 kPa and a water holding capacity of 80.62%. The gelling mechanism study suggests that the high aspect ratio allowed fibrillar aggregates to build a higher level of structures with positive characteristics along with other attractive interactions including hydrophobic interactions and disulfide bonds to build strong gels. Therefore, this research has developed a new strategy to prepare improved lentil protein gels for food texturization from LPI fibrillar aggregates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".