MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092618160 · doi:10.1002/advs.202002358

Promoting Ge Alloying Reaction via Heterostructure Engineering for High Efficient and Ultra‐Stable Sodium‐Ion Storage

2020· article· en· W3092618160 on OpenAlexafffund
Chaoqun Shang, Le Hu, Dan Luo, Krzysztof Kempa, Yongguang Zhang, Guofu Zhou, Xin Wang, Zhongwei Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of WaterlooNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
KeywordsMaterials scienceHeterojunctionAnodeGermaniumChemical engineeringIonSodiumNanotechnologyElectrodeChemistrySiliconOptoelectronicsPhysical chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Germanium (Ge)‐based materials have been considered as potential anode materials for sodium‐ion batteries owing to their high theoretical specific capacity. However, the poor conductivity and Na + diffusivity of Ge‐based materials result in retardant ion/electron transportation and insufficient sodium storage efficiency, leading to sluggish reaction kinetics. To intrinsically maximize the sodium storage capability of Ge, the nitrogen doped carbon‐coated Cu 3 Ge/Ge heterostructure material (Cu 3 Ge/Ge@N‐C) is developed for enhanced sodium storage. The pod‐like structure of Cu 3 Ge/Ge@N‐C exposes numerous active surface to shorten ion transportation pathway while the uniform encapsulation of carbon shell improves the electron transportation, leading to enhanced reaction kinetics. Theoretical calculation reveals that Cu 3 Ge/Ge heterostructure can offer decent electron conduction and lower the Na + diffusion barrier, which further promotes Ge alloying reaction and improves its sodium storage capability close to its theoretical value. In addition, the uniform encapsulation of nitrogen‐doped carbon on Cu 3 Ge/Ge heterostructure material efficiently alleviates its volume expansion and prevents its decomposition, further ensuring its structural integrity upon cycling. Attributed to these unique superiorities, the as‐prepared Cu 3 Ge/Ge@N‐C electrode demonstrates admirable discharge capacity, outstanding rate capability and prolonged cycle lifespan (178 mAh g −1 at 4.0 A g −1 after 4000 cycles).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced ScienceSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207