MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092637456 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.550827

Aspergillus-Derived Galactosaminogalactan Triggers Complement Activation on Human Platelets

2020· article· en· W3092637456 on OpenAlexaff
Hemalata Deshmukh, Cornelia Speth, Donald C. Sheppard, Magdalena Neurauter, Reinhard Würzner, Cornelia Lass‐Flörl, Günter Rambach

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersAustrian Science Fund
KeywordsComplement systemAspergillus fumigatusPlateletLectin pathwayClassical complement pathwayMicrobiologyAnaphylatoxinImmunologyBiologyAntibody opsonizationInnate immune systemChemistryImmune systemOpsoninPhagocytosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Invasive fungal infections caused by Aspergillus (A.) and Mucorales species still represent life-threatening diseases in immunocompromised individuals, and deeper knowledge about fungal interactions with elements of innate immunity, such as complement and platelets, appear essential for optimized therapy. Previous studies showed that galactosaminogalactan secreted by A. fumigatus and A. flavus is deposited on platelets, thereby inducing their activation. Since the altered platelet surface is a putative trigger for complement activation, we aimed to study the interplay of platelets with complement in the presence of fungal GAG. Culture supernatants (SN) of A. fumigatus and A. flavus both induced not only GAG deposition, but also subsequent deposition of complement C3 fragments on the platelet surface. The SN of a uge3 mutant of A. fumigatus, which is unable to synthesize GAG, did not induce complement deposition on platelets, nor did the SN of other Aspergillus species and all tested Mucorales. Detailed analysis revealed that GAG deposition itself triggered the complement cascade rather than the GAG-induced phosphatidylserine exposure. The lectin pathway of complement could be shown to be crucially involved in this process. GAG-induced complement activation on the platelet surface was revealed to trigger processes that might contribute to the pathogenesis of invasive aspergillosis by A. fumigatus or A. flavus. Both pro-inflammatory anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a arose when platelets were incubated with SN of these fungal species; these processes might favor excessive inflammation after fungal infection. Furthermore, platelets were stimulated to shed microparticles, which are also known to harbor pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant properties. Not only early processes of the complement cascade proceed on platelets, but also the formation of the terminal complement C5b-9 complex was detected on platelets after incubation with fungal SN. Subsequently, reduced viability of the platelets could be shown, which might contribute to the lowered platelet numbers found in infected patients. In summary, fungal GAG initiates an interplay between complement and platelets that can be supposed to contribute to excessive inflammation, thrombocytopenia, and thrombosis, which are important hallmarks of fatal invasive mycoses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ImmunologySame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207